In our previous lessons we have looked at reasons for abstinence from alchohol. The influence of example has been a key point. We have been concerned that others may be led by a drinker's example, to drink themselves. Consequently, if they are weak, they may stumble into sin, either by violating their conscience or
Someone might ask why one must totally abstain from alchohol to avoid these dangers? If the main problem is the example we set, why couldn't we simply drink in private, in circumstances where vulnerable people would not see us and therefore would not be influenced
We can do things in strict privacy, but we do not deny that we do them, nor pretend that we don't. For example a husband and wife's sexual relationship is a very private matter to them. However they do not deny that they have it, and would hardly want people to think
As another example, Jesus said, "When you give alms, do not let your right hand know what your left hand is doing, that your alms may be in secret... and when you pray, go into your inner room and shut your door, then pray to your Father who is in secret..."
Private drinking does not, therefore, solve the problem of adverse influence, because although one may drink privately, he does not deny that he drinks, and he does not pretend to be a
A teetotaller is able to say openly that he is a
One of the dangers of drinking in private, is that its a bit like lighting a camp fire. The campfire might be a small private affair, but a spark can still jump into the scrub and start a very
The problems caused by consuming alchohol may seem to be contained when the drinking is done in a small group unseen by others. A family, for example, might include wine, just a glass each, with the evening meal. The family may believe quite honestly that there is no danger in that. However this is
The proverbial dust swept under the carpet may have been put out of sight, but it has not been removed. Private drinking of alchohol takes the drinking out of sight, but does not remove it from the devil's field of opportunity. We are warned, "Do not give the devil a place"
One of the devil's favourite ploys is the "if this then that" falacy. People do something that they believe is right and proper, such as having a glass of wine with their evening meal at home. Then comes the night for the eldest child to bring home a friend for the evening meal. Will the wine be on the table as usual? Well the friend likes a glass of wine too, and if we can have it every other night, then why can't we have it the night that a friend visits? Then comes time for the child's birthday party. The parents say no alchohol at the party, but the child says that if it's okay for us to have alchohol at our evening meal when one friend visits, why isn't it okay to have it at the party with fifteen friends? After all, it's still at home under our
See how it goes? If this then that. One increment at a time. After a few of those, it's all got out of hand. The devil loves to play this game, because there's so many possibilities. He can manipulate a principle so nicely that you will begin to believe that if you can buy a bottle of beer and drink it, then you can buy a brewery and make millions of bottles for
Total abstinence poses none of these problems. It's clear cut and straight forward. Zero is zero. It gives the devil no place, no purchase. Taking alchohol out of sight does not take it out of the devil's reach. The Bible says, "Resist the devil, and he will flee from you"