Pilate wrote an inscription, and put it on the cross of Jesus. Many of the Jews read this inscription, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city. The inscription was written in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek
JESUS THE NAZARENE,
THE KING OF THE JEWS
There is perhaps much more in this inscription than meets the eye. It seems that Pilate intended more to be read into it than he actually wrote. And more still can properly be read into it, than even Pilate might have intended. Of course the five truths below cannot be deduced from the sign on the cross. However, when these truths are revealed to us in the gospel, then we are able to see them embedded in
No doubt Pilate wrote the name "JESUS" because that was the name of the one being crucified. But this name was given by God at Jesus's birth because it meant something -- Saviour
No doubt Pilate's inscription describes Jesus as "THE NAZARENE" simply to identify him in terms of geographical address. But, perhaps unbeknown to Pilate, there survived an old prophecy that the Messiah (or Christ, the coming King) would "be called a Nazarene"
Unfortunately the populace was in no mood to reflect upon this at the time. We, however, removed from the heat of the moment, should reflect upon it soberly. For the prophets also called him, "a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief... pierced through for our transgressions"
Next, the inscription calls Jesus "KING". Pilate had questioned Jesus carefully about whether he was a political king. Pilate had been satisfied with the answer Jesus gave: "My kingdom is not of this world"
The inscription representing Jesus as Saviour and King may have said, "OF THE JEWS", yet it was written in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek. Hebrew was the language of the Jews in Jerusalem. But Latin was the official language of the Roman world superpower, whilst Greek was the most widely spoken language
The inscription was multilingual for the practical reason that anyone might then understand it, not just the Jew but also the foreigner passing by. This happened to be appropriately symbolic as well. The inscription was written first to the Jew, and also to the Gentile, which reflected the "the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile"
It was customary to write and display the accusation against a man being crucified. Accordingly, "they put above his head the charge written against him"
Pilate had found no guilt in Jesus (Jhn 19:6). This was why the "accusation" he wrote was really no accusation at all. It is fitting that Jesus was, at least officially, accused of no wrongdoing, because "he did no sin"
But if Jesus did no sin, and there was no guilt in him, the question arises, Why was he being punished? Surely God would not allow his Son to be punished so cruelly if not for guilt? Yet he was not being punished for his own guilt, for he had none. Then for whose guilt
When you answer that question for yourself, you have answered the other question we are asking in this series, "Why be religious?" When you realise that Jesus died "for our transgressions"