This lesson looks at where various ministries of benevolence and charity fit into the
Some people eke out a living by ringing up churches and asking for charity. That's what they think churches are there for. However Jesus did not build his church because he thought the
Having said that, I am sure it is a given that the church should have a reputation for helping the poor and needy. Nobody denies that fact. Jesus made it one of the marks of true Christianity. Take for example
The church, however, does not have unlimited resources, so it has to prioritise its work of charity in at least five fruitful ways which
The church puts the ministry of preaching and spreading the gospel in the place
The "great commission"
Those of us who have been missionaries in poverty stricken countries however, know that you cannot preach the gospel and ignore the pressing material deprivations of the people. When people are without food, shelter, clothing, medicine, literacy, and such like, you have to try to help them. On the other hand, many people will come to the church, and even pretend to become Christians, just to get material gain. This is just like what happened after Jesus fed the five thousand (Jhn 6:26-27). So you have to be careful, otherwise you will be creating a charity disguised as a church instead of the
THE BRIDGE NOT THE BAIT
Imagine a person on a bridge dangling a baited line into the water. The church's charitable ministry should not be a bait. That's no way to be "fishers of men"
Charity should be done for charity's sake, out of love for our neighbour. There should be no ulterior motive. Of course, converting people to Christ is also an act of love, but only if one is truly winning people to Christ their Saviour for their soul's sake. If one is wooing them into a denomination and using charity to recruit members, then that's an ulterior motive. Benevolence shouldn't be used
If benevolence is not a bait, to what shall we liken it? It's more like the bridge. The bridge is part of the road. Without the bridge you could not continue to walk the road. Benevolence is part of the way that is walked by the "beautiful feet"
On the other hand, we won't be able to interact with people if they have pressing deprivations that we ignore. Yet we must keep in mind our real purpose. When you walk to the Post Office, and you cross a bridge to get there, your purpose is not to cross the bridge but to post a letter. The church is taking the message of Christ to people. That's
The church is "the pillar and ground of the truth"
The important ministry in the first congregation of Christians was "to prayer and to the word of God"
The church directs its works of charity primarily
The previously mentioned example in Acts 6:1-7 shows that the charitable work of the first church was among its own members. This does not mean that the church never helps an unbeliever, but it does "good to all men especially those who are of the household of faith"
The first church gave to "all as anyone had need"
The church looks after its own, and doesn't expect the wider community to carry that burden. On the other hand, people in the wider community should not expect the church to do the charity that generally they ought to be doing themselves. Of course all members of the church are also members of that wider community, and neither should they be expecting the church to do for them what they can do for themselves. Our next points
The church expects its own members to look after their own and not burden the church with what is
In looking after widows in its number, the church restricted its assistance to those who were "widows indeed". Not only had they lost their husbands, but they were old and had no family to care for them. Where a widow had family, it was the family's responsibility to look after her "that the church be not charged"
Notice, by the way, that Christians who are able to look after their own family members, yet expect the church to provide instead, are "worse than infidels"
The church expects individuals to look after themselves and provide their
In the previously mentioned case
I know of people who have a wide open opportunity to gain an education and get into a career, and yet they prefer to be on the dole. They blow their dole on cigarettes, grog, and junk food, then go around
Note that the church, by the authority of Christ, takes a hard line on people whom we in Australia call bludgers. The rule is, "If a man will not work, neither let him eat"
The good works of the church are directed toward urgent and pressing needs, not
The kind of circumstance that church benevolence addresses is "a brother or sister without clothing and in need of daily food"
We are taught to be rich in good works "in order to meet pressing needs"
While the church is not to be niggardly and mean, its benevolent activity is really about meeting urgent and necessary requirements. There is a principle in Christianity that we might all suffer hardships at times, and it doesn't hurt us. "Having food and covering let us be therewith content"